[PRR-talk] Passenger car trucks
Bruce Smith
smithbf at auburn.edu
Wed Jan 30 14:29:33 EST 2008
On Jan 30, 2008, at 1:16 PM, ndbprr at att.net wrote:
> I was looking through the 1953 Car Builders Cyclopedia and noticed
> the huge variety of passenger car trucks with many roads including
> the PRR having their own designs. Why did roads have their own
> design requirements? Why weren't passenger car trucks standardized
> like freight car trucks?
Because freight car trucks weren't "standardized" either! The PRR
had its own designs as well as using many other commercial designs
for freight car trucks. In either case, truck design had to consider
a number of variables including the weight of the car, its intended
purpose, the "ride" needed, bolster location etc. In the case of the
PRR, the PRR designed and built many of its cars, especially in the
early 20th century, and therefore the PRR probably felt that their
truck designs were better suited for their needs than many other
sources. There are a wide variety of different trucks on PRR freight
cars and although many modelers fail to appropriate model these, many
more model trucks have become available in the past few years. Post
WWII, you see more standardization in both passenger and freight car
trucks on new PRR cars, and more reliance on 3rd parties to design
and build the trucks.
Regards
Bruce
Bruce F. Smith
Auburn, AL
http://www.vetmed.auburn.edu/index.pl/bruce_f._smith2
"Some days you are the bug, some days you are the windshield."
__
/ \
__<+--+>________________\__/___ ________________________________
|- ______/ O O \_______ -| | __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ |
| / 4999 PENNSYLVANIA 4999 \ | ||__||__||__||__||__||__||__||__||
|/_____________________________\|_|________________________________|
| O--O \0 0 0 0/ O--O | 0-0-0 0-0-0
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://dsop.com/pipermail/prr-talk/attachments/20080130/8873ccc3/attachment.html
More information about the PRR-talk
mailing list